Saltypepper

A sweet tongue in a bitter mouth.
Perpetually unfocused.
~ Thursday, October 20 ~
Permalink
“ Look at the political base of the Democratic Party: it is single mothers who run a household. Why? Because it’s so tough economically that they look to the government for help and therefore they’re going to vote. So if you want to reduce the Democratic advantage, what you want to do is build two parent families, you eliminate that desire for government.
—

Rick Santorum, suggesting that if you just get single women husbands, they won’t vote for Democrats.

Why do I get the feeling that his idea of making a joke is to chuckle and say, “Haha, you know, women…”

(via cognitivedissonance)

Wow. I just…wow.

(via robot-heart-politics)

Ugh.

Is this kind of like how women will stop and ask for directions but men won’t? Single women will ask the govt for help, but once they get married, asking for help is, what, impossible? Because it isn’t always unnecessary, that’s for sure.

I’m betting Santorum is the kind of guy who will hire a man, because “he has a family to support,” but single moms are always ass out and “should just get married.” His statement is so full of frothy bullshit, I just can’t.

(Source: rightwingwatch.org)


464 notes
  1. jumblejo reblogged this from jumblejo
  2. femiknitst reblogged this from pleaseslowitdown
  3. cellycelia reblogged this from cognitivedissonance
  4. rantingnraging reblogged this from cognitivedissonance
  5. avenge-me-avengers reblogged this from indoorcowgirl
  6. indoorcowgirl reblogged this from heisenbergsays
  7. stayinbedgrowyourhair reblogged this from heisenbergsays and added:
    if ANYONE is surprised to hear him say this, then it’s your fault for not paying attention. santorum and the MANY MANY...
  8. heisenbergsays reblogged this from tea-and-misanthropy
  9. misspepita reblogged this from aestian
  10. tea-and-misanthropy reblogged this from robot-heart-politics
  11. timeconfusionandrocketships reblogged this from krazy-with-a-k-kaylee
  12. shriekinprophet reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  13. sarrrasaurus reblogged this from schala
  14. badtextpost reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  15. schala reblogged this from robot-heart-politics
  16. blowtomelt reblogged this from ghdos
  17. ashlynnbast reblogged this from tehsunshine
  18. princessparadox reblogged this from snowdarkred
  19. kylegreggy reblogged this from robot-heart-politics
  20. hanabi reblogged this from seriouslyimportantthings and added:
    It’s definitely a practical miscalculation (as in, it makes no sense to anyone who thinks about it for even half a...
  21. lullingshores reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  22. nonzeropossibility reblogged this from methuselah-honeysuckle and added:
    Rick Santorum: Bringin’ the country back to 1692!
  23. zosky reblogged this from robot-heart-politics
  24. the-f-train reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  25. seriouslyimportantthings reblogged this from baileyeverywhere and added:
    [emphasis added] what’s kind of funny to me is that as far as i can tell, the core of his reason statement is “because...
  26. thoughtsithinkthem reblogged this from baileyeverywhere and added:
    ——————- Everything said by everyone else. Rick Santorum, GET THE EFF OUT OF THIS RACE PLEASE AND THANK YOU.
  27. baileyeverywhere reblogged this from hanabi
  28. rocklandrenascence reblogged this from mistynovembernight
  29. ceasesilence reblogged this from nessfraserloves
  30. dostluq reblogged this from werewolf-weekday
  31. ihaveahulk reblogged this from hanabi and added:
    obsolete.) Whenever I read something from Rick Santorum I remember to visit this(http://spreadingsantorum.com/) website...
  32. fireblooms reblogged this from uglychu
reblogged via karnythia